Salvete!
Why do you then not just tell me what the correct word is instead of criticizing my choice?
I am not an English native speaker. German "verweichlicht" is translated as "effeminate" in English. In Latin effeminatio also means "softening", which is also evident in the fact that virtus is derived from vir. The use of the word virtus or "virtue" would then also be a wrong choice, which would make any discussion about Stoic philosophy really absurd.
You have also not told me what the self-denomination of the SJW movement is, since you assume that it is pejorative. In this case there must be a neutral word for it.
It is also very important to understand that a philosopher defines the words that he uses himself. He is not bound by the common use of this word. It is however necessary to define an uncommon use of a word in the text or if somebody asks If you try to enforce dictionary definitions of words, then you are a linguist, not a philosopher. In philosophy it is not permissible to criticize the use of a word, only to ask for a definition.
Furthermore you should not complain, when a thread manages to inspire some activity, even if it is controversial. I tried to get a discussion going about Seneca's letters to Lucilius without any success. Now I prefer just to read them for myself. It makes no sense to have a monologue here. Therefore be happy about the little activity that we have now and do not try to silence it.
Valete!